7 March 2017

High Court finds SA’s decision to withdraw from the ICC invalid and unconstitutional

President and Ministers of International Relations and Justice have been ordered to revoke the notice of withdrawal.

The Pretoria High Court’s decision to rule the South African government’s withdrawal from the International Criminal Court as procedurally invalid and unconstitutional has been lauded by the opposing party.

Deputy Judge President Phineas Mojapelo, in handing down judgment, ordered the President and Ministers of International Relations and Justice to revoke the notice of withdrawal. He also ordered the State to pay the costs of the applicants.

Deputy Judge President Mojapela said: “There is prematurity and procedural irrationality in the notice to withdraw from the Rome Statute by [the] executive without parliamentary approval.”

The Democratic Alliance, the ruling party’s main opposition in South Africa, litigated based on procedural flaws, stating in their heads of argument that government’s notice to Parliament presented the decision as a fact and not a decision which had to be considered.

Steven Budlender, acting for the opposing party told the court: “It does not suggest that Parliament has to approve it. The effect is to bypass Parliament. It is simply telling Parliament for informational purposes.”

Controversy continued to follow government’s decision to withdraw after Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir visited South Africa in June 2015.

According to the ICC, the first warrant for arrest for Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir was issued on 4 March 2009. A second warrant was issued on 12 July 2010. It was expected that in his visit to SA in 2015, that he would be apprehended and transferred to the seat of the Court in The Hague to face charges of crimes against humanity, genocide and war crimes committed in Sudan between 2003 and 2008.

English, German, French, Zulu, Tswana, Xhosa, Sotho and Afrikaans

The Central, 96 Rivonia Road, Sandton, 2196, Johannesburg, South Africa

Resources

Explore Articles

South Africa: Are your employees’ wearables creating a new governance blind spot
14 October 2026
Over the past decade, organisations have invested heavily in securing workplacetechnology. Laptops, smartphones, cloud applications and enterprise networks a...
South African Exporters Face Rising Costs Under EU Carbon Rules
30 September 2026
The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism has shifted from paperwork to payment in 2026 and South African exporters of steel, aluminium, cement and iron ar...
South Africa: Key Tax Considerations When Moving Home
14 September 2026
Key considerations, including the treatment of foreign assets, exchange controlrequirements and the potential tax consequences of becoming a South Africanres...
What you need to know now to protect your brand in China
10 September 2026
Brand owners take note. Effective 2027 China will amend its Trade MarkLaw. Efforts to curb trade mark hoarding are further prioritised coupledwith more strin...
South Africa: Is cryptocurrency ‘capital’?                  Taking the Mangundhla judgment under the loop
7 August 2026
Introduction Two Gauteng Division judgements have reached diametrically oppositeconclusions on the question as to whether cryptocurrency constitutes“capital...
South Africa: A safe voice or silent risk
15 July 2026
An attempt at reforming whistleblower protection through the Protected Disclosures Draft Bill The case of Babita Deokaran, a senior official at the Gauten...
Digital taxes are reshaping cross-border e-commerce economics in Africa
7 July 2026
Digital taxation has moved from policy debate to regulatory reality. Governments across the world are implementing measures aimed at taxing revenue generated...
South Africa: Cryptocurrency is money and capital for exchange-control purposes
23 June 2026
1. Introduction 1.1. This case involved Mr Mangundhla and Ms Dangaiso, who both had trading accounts on the Luno platform, a well-known cryptocurrency tr...
Trustee Recognition and Cross-Border Surplus Distribution in South Africa
29 April 2026
In a recent decision, Scheer v Wagner NO and Others, the Supreme Court of Appeal considered the key issue of the recognition of a foreign insolvency tru...
South Africa: Pricing the same as your competitors – unlawful or permissible?
30 March 2026
One often observes in the marketplace that prices of products advertised or sold by two competitors are the same or similar. Commentators (especially on soci...