Tanzania News

Firm Details

FB Attorneys
+255 22 2135994/5
8th floor, Amani Place, Ohio Street P.O. Box 19813 Dar es Salaam Tanzania
Kiswahili, English, German, Gujerati, Hindi

US Court rules in favour of Tanzania

On 12 February 2018, the widow and children of a famous businessman, the late Devram Valambhia initiated a case in the District Court of Columbia to seek recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment obtained in Tanzanian Courts.

The Plaintiffs in the above case were Vipula D. Valambia, Priscilla D. Valambhia, Punita D. Valambhia, and Krishnakant D. Valambhia. The Respondents were the United Republic of Tanzania (Attorney General), the Bank of Tanzania (BoT), and the Ministry of Defence and National Service. The Plaintiffs were specifically seeking recognition and execution of a decree for payment of USD 55,099,171.66 issued by the High Court of Tanzania in 2003.

The claim in this case was based on a contract entered into in 1980 for the purchase of military equipment between Transport Equipment Ltd (TEL), a company owned by the late Valambhia, and the Government of Tanzania. TEL claimed for non-payment of the entire contractual sum which moved TEL to file a case in the High Court of Tanzania in 1989.

The Court decided the case in favor of TEL and awarded a decretal sum of USD 55,099,171.66. Recently, after several attempts to execute, the Plaintiffs instituted the case in the District Court of Columbia, USA for the enforcement of the decree. The Government of Tanzania opposed the case on the grounds that it was instituted in contradiction of US laws on recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the United States. The Government of Tanzania claimed to have immunity which is recognized under the US Foreign Rule Immunities Act. The said Act entitles foreign states to immunity from the jurisdiction of Courts in the United States subject to certain enumerated exceptions.

The decision

On 31 March 2019, the Court through Hon. Judge Tanya S. Chutkan ruled in favour of the Attorney General of Tanzania and dismissed the Complaint for lack of jurisdiction on the subject matter. The Court held that the Complaint did not involve commercial activities in the United States, which is a prerequisite under the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act.

To read the Memorandum Opinion click here

Article compiled by Tanzanian member firm FB Attorneys

Media

Explore our news articles, specialist publications and browse through our webinars and gallery

What We Do

Explore our range of expertise, and see how we can help you.
Banking, Finance, Investment Funds & Private Equity
Business Crimes & Investigations
Competition Law
Construction & Engineering
Corporate Mergers & Acquisitions
Cyber Law, Block chain & Technology
Dispute Resolution
General Business Law
Healthcare and Life Sciences
Infrastructure, Energy & Projects
Insolvency & Business Restructuring
Intellectual Property
Labour & Employment
Local Investment Laws and Indigenisation
Media, Broadcasting & Communications
Mining, Environmental & Resources
Property Law and Real Estate
Tax

Member Countries

Explore our member firms by country

Algeria
Angola
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Cameroon
DRC
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Ghana
Guinea Conakry
Ivory Coast
Kenya
Lesotho
Malawi
Mali
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nigeria
Rwanda
Senegal
South Africa
Tanzania
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe